| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Josh the cat |
Posted - 05/10/2006 : 21:09:04
Benj
Did I read that you are only adding films that are filming?
Porky's is listed on I.M.D.B as "Announced" and under comments it says still scripting. The release date is stated as 2007 not 2006.
Cheers and sorry
Josh the cat |
| 15 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| benj clews |
Posted - 07/07/2023 : 13:58:27
quote:
Originally posted by TitanPa
quote:
Originally posted by ChocolateLady
Someone added Welcome Back, Kotter (2007) recently and IMDb has it only as announced. I forget - at what point do you add a film here. I thought it was only after its begun filming.
17 years later and its still in limbo on IMDB
Hmm... I guess we keep it until IMDB says otherwise, but obviously review at your own risk as it could go... |
| TitanPa |
Posted - 03/06/2023 : 19:55:01
quote:
Originally posted by ChocolateLady
Someone added Welcome Back, Kotter (2007) recently and IMDb has it only as announced. I forget - at what point do you add a film here. I thought it was only after its begun filming.
17 years later and its still in limbo on IMDB |
| ChocolateLady |
Posted - 04/12/2006 : 06:06:35
Someone added Welcome Back, Kotter (2007) recently and IMDb has it only as announced. I forget - at what point do you add a film here. I thought it was only after its begun filming. |
| thefoxboy |
Posted - 04/12/2006 : 05:02:29
Apocalypse Now (1979)
Apocalypse Now (redux) (2001)
One needs to stay and one needs to go, Now.  |
| demonic |
Posted - 04/12/2006 : 04:24:53
Not yet. |
| SixFourian |
Posted - 23/11/2006 : 13:48:40
Thanks. |
| benj clews |
Posted - 23/11/2006 : 13:34:15
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
Benj, could you please remind me what the earliest stage allowed for new films? Is it 'Filming', i.e. 'Pre-production' is no good? Thanks.
I tend to go with anything from Filming onwards. |
| SixFourian |
Posted - 23/11/2006 : 13:32:17
Benj, could you please remind me what the earliest stage allowed for new films? Is it 'Filming', i.e. 'Pre-production' is no good? Thanks. |
| SixFourian |
Posted - 13/11/2006 : 13:02:12
I'd already rewarded that one. |
| Whippersnapper. |
Posted - 13/11/2006 : 12:04:11
OK, thanks for the explanation guys! Press here for your reward. |
| SixFourian |
Posted - 13/11/2006 : 09:22:22
Thanks - that's good to know. |
| BaftaBaby |
Posted - 13/11/2006 : 09:11:35
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
quote:
Originally posted by Whippersnapper
Cathy Come Home (1966) is a TV drama and marked in IMDB as "TV", so should it be here?
I didn't know whether Benj would approve that one as it was under the umbrella of The Wednesday Play. However, as that was really just a set of films for television, it really should be fine.
Dunno whether it's relevant, but I believe this [wonderful, seminal] film did get a US theatrical release in the late 60s.
|
| SixFourian |
Posted - 13/11/2006 : 08:54:48
quote:
Originally posted by Whippersnapper
Cathy Come Home (1966) is a TV drama and marked in IMDB as "TV", so should it be here?
I didn't know whether Benj would approve that one as it was under the umbrella of The Wednesday Play. However, as that was really just a set of films for television, it really should be fine. |
| ChocolateLady |
Posted - 13/11/2006 : 06:07:43
quote:
Originally posted by Whippersnapper
Cathy Come Home (1966) is a TV drama and marked in IMDB as "TV", so should it be here?
From what I understand, made for TV movies are okay as long as they're not marked as series or mini-series. That's why the Helen Mirren Elizabeth I was allowed. |
| Whippersnapper. |
Posted - 12/11/2006 : 18:56:21
Cathy Come Home (1966) is a TV drama and marked in IMDB as "TV", so should it be here?
|
